Uneven Curiosity

One of the quiet conundrums I carried in my time as a missionary in PNG was this: why is it that so much is expected of us, in terms of cultural sensitivity and adaptation, while almost nothing is asked in return?

I don’t mean that harshly. It’s just… something I noticed. Again and again.

We were trained to bend, to soften, to listen carefully, to hold our tongues when things felt off-kilter. We were taught new languages, both spoken and not. We were taught to treat every cultural difference with reverence, to assume goodwill, to hold space for what we didn’t yet understand.

But I rarely, if ever, saw that same posture mirrored back toward us.

There seemed to be no collective curiosity about our culture—no sense that our ways might also be different and worthy of understanding. It often felt like the flow of effort and empathy was a one-way stream, and that to speak up about the toll this took would somehow make me unkind.

So instead, we shut down.

Not from superiority. Not from spite. From fatigue. From the effort of constantly treading gently, constantly translating ourselves, constantly shrinking in the name of peace and conformity.

I saw it in others too. In the shoulders drawn tight. In the careful pauses before someone responded. In the practiced neutral tone. We weren’t being false; we were just being careful. Careful not to offend. Careful not to be misunderstood. Careful to fit in—if not in heart, then at least in silence.

And yet, when we were surprised or jarred by something, we’d often whisper to each other, “It’s okay. Every culture is different. This wasn’t personal.”

We made space. We stretched wide.

But there was another layer to my silence, one I didn’t always know how to name. I was not just an expat trying to fit in—I was a young, single, white woman in a place where that trifecta was impossibly conspicuous.

I felt watched. Not always unkindly, but constantly. And sometimes, dangerously.

There were many days I simply couldn’t go out. Not without risk. Not without dread curling in my belly. There were roads I couldn’t drive, markets I couldn’t enter, places I couldn’t be alone. I learned to scan every street, every pair of eyes. I learned to disappear in plain sight. To hide.

It was too dangerous to be out.

Too dangerous to be me.

The only one of my kind in the wild.

And yet, I was still expected to be warm, open, adaptable. To engage, to explain myself, to never show discomfort. But so often, the cost of simply existing in that place was already more than I could say aloud.

So I became smaller. Quieter. I folded myself inwards. I dressed in plain clothes and gentle tones. I deflected attention. I kept my stories close to my chest. I let others speak first. I practiced invisibility.

And still—I loved. I served. I laughed with local women in smoky huts. I sang in church aisles. I listened to stories that broke my heart and mended it again. But I often felt like a ghost version of myself—present, but not fully seen. Tolerated – yes, respected – perhaps, but definitely not understood.

I don’t blame individuals. Many were kind, and some were curious in quiet, tender ways. But as a whole, I think PNG as a nation—a young, mono-cultural one still learning to hold difference without suspicion—has not yet had to ask these questions. Has not yet been called to look outward with the same empathy we were trained to bring inward.

And I wonder if, perhaps, that mutual curiosity could be the beginning of something sacred.

Because I truly believe there’s untapped potential here—relationally, spiritually, economically—for growth that could come through understanding. If people in PNG took the time to truly see and know their international friends, especially those who quietly fold themselves to fit, I think there’d be more cohesion. More grace. More beautiful partnership.

And maybe—just maybe—fewer women like me, carrying their full selves in silence, waiting for someone to ask, “What is it like for you here?”

Comments

3 responses to “Uneven Curiosity”

  1. CritterFlitter Avatar
    CritterFlitter

    This reads less like reflection and more like shock at not being centred. I have never read such blatant obnoxiousness before.You describe feeling invisible, unacknowledged, misunderstood—but what you’re really naming is the experience of not being the main character in a place that was never yours to begin with. That’s not erasure. That’s what it feels like when power shifts and the narrative isn’t orbiting around you.

    The expectation that PNG should have extended more curiosity toward you, while you were there in a position of immense inherited and unearned power, is disgustingly entitled. It overlooks the deep, daily resilience of local women—who navigate the same dangers you name, without your choices, your passport, your wealth, or your platform. And certainly without the protection of your white-skin.

    Additionally, you clearly confuse discomfort for harm. And mistaking the two is exactly the kind of self-centering that communities like PNG have had to endure for far too long. It’s a good thing you’re no longer there – they could certainly use less of this attitude from people who claim to be there to ‘help’ but can’t even cope with the basics. Shame on you.

    Like

  2. Chris Avatar
    Chris

    There is nothing wrong with this author expressing their perspective and wishes, or having feelings and struggles that may be different to yours. We cannot know the full extent or uniqueness of their time in PNG – I know mine was wildly different to my neighbor’s.The writer is certainly allowed to express their sense of being “invisible, unacknowledged, misunderstood…”, and it is vulnerable and brave to do so. Sure, maybe that’s the price of choosing to dwell in a country such as PNG, but it doesn’t mean they have to love it, or that they are not allowed to be surprised at the extent to which it affected them.It is also worth noting that this person has not made the sweeping blanket statements of the ignorant. They write: “I don’t blame individuals. Many were kind, and some were curious in quiet, tender ways. But as a whole, I think PNG as a nation—a young, mono-cultural one still learning to hold difference without suspicion—has not yet had to ask these questions.” Any country has its issues, and this is something that this person raised as a struggle for themselves in this context.Overall, a little more grace (given we don’t know the full picture) and a few less harsh words would go well with feedback on posts such as this – you make some great points, but many could be shared with a bit less anger and a bit more curiosity and compassion. Statements such as “It’s a good thing you’re no longer there,” come across as extremely judgemental, even arrogant in assumption. In closing, thank you for highlighting further facets of what is a very multi-sided diamond. Let’s keep future discussions amicable and gracious.

    Like

    1. CritterFlitter Avatar
      CritterFlitter

      Thanks for reinforcing my point throigh your tone-policing. You’re not asking for grace, you are giving us a gentle rebuke wrapped in moral language, designed to protect a narrative that casts a white woman’s discomfort as something sacred.

      What you’re doing is instructing others to speak softly in the presence of fragility, not asking for real kindness – because clearly you don’t know the meaning of the word. You’re saying that the emotional tone of a response matters more than the truth it names. That challenging a skewed, self-centred account of PNG is less acceptable than the discomfort of being challenged.

      But let’s not confuse civility with virtue. You frame this post as brave, vulnerable, and misunderstood—but what it enacts is a familiar trope: the quiet, wounded white woman, casting her isolation as injustice, her discomfort as evidence of a culture’s failure to care for her properly.

      That’s manipulation, not vulnerability. And your response helps it hold its shape – I can only guess you’re well practiced in playing victim yourself.

      Real grace doesn’t require silence or softness. It holds space for discomfort. It knows that sometimes clarity must come before kindness—and that truth spoken clearly isn’t cruelty.

      So I’ll ask you this: when a woman claims harm any time she’s decentered—how much truth are we meant to hold back, just to protect the performance?

      Like

Leave a comment